
We made a splash at Gobbl last week when we revealed our list of New York’s top fifty restaurants based on an ultra secret formula. Though we made every effort to leave out our own biases in the creation of the most objective list possible, the Gobbl Top 50 sparked a hearty debate among NYC food enthusiasts. Some suggested that the Top 50 was skewed in a particular direction or composed of exclusively overpriced, celebrity-chef locales while still others were excited to see that their favorite digs were ranked so high. Fellow diners, you are in for a definite treat as we reveal to you today a few of the criteria that we considered in the crafting of our all-too secret Gobbl Top 50 formula.
The criteria for the Gobbl Top 50 drew from the experiences of nearly 700 New York diners, as we employed not only the point of view of critics but the general public as well.
• We gave the public’s opinion a healthy 70% of the weight in the formula, while the reviews of notable food critics (among them Frank Bruni and Adam Platt) received 30% of the formula’s weight.
• Drawing from an extensive list of community-based review sites, we valued the sites with quality reviews far more than the ones populated mostly by rants and raves.
• We threw all of the data we accumulated into our high-tech number cruncher, and out came a polished version of the Gobbl Top 50, a computer-generated ranking based on all of the information that we had accumulated.
Let this gastronomic debate live on and tell us what you think! Is an objective top list even possible? Or is the ranking system at its core subjective?